Welcome to '7.30' NSW.
Start 29-09-2012 05:59 AM
End 29-09-2012 06:33 AM
I'm Quentin Dempster.
Quentin Dempster |
There is a big integrity test coming for the O'Farrell Government and its oversight body the Police Integrity Commission. It concerns an old wound, bitterly hurt feelings among many senior police with unblemished service records and the integrity of the system itself.
The current inspector of the police integrity commission,
David Levine QC has been asked by the Government to consider the public release
of what's called the Emblems Report into the alleged abuse of covert
surveillance search warrants dating back 12 years. The warrants, some regularly
reissued with the approval of judges, named 114 serving and former police and
some civilians. Many want a judicial inquiry to clear the air.
What is all this about? It has suppressed been secret for 10
years and suppressed by successive State Governments, when you read it you can
understand why they want to suppress it. It casts into doubt the role of
special crime and internal affairs, the NSW Crime Commission and the Police
Integrity Commission and it casts questions on the Supreme Court of NSW.
It is little wonder they don't want this out.
Neil Mercer |
This is the contentious affidavit leaked to veteran Sydney
crime reporter Neil Mercer of the 'Sun Herald'. Under the name of an officer
attached to the NSW Crime Commission, it lists dozens of names and in marked
paragraphs, describes the evidentiary leads and roar intelligence the officer
relied on to persuade a Supreme Court judge in 2000 to approve listening device
warrants. In an operation said to be needed to expose police corruption, an
already self confessed corrupt police officer, code named M5, a registered
crime commission informant was wired for sound for two and a half years and
tried to engage his targets in private conversations.
Virginia Bell |
This is the affidavit which was presented to Virginia Bell
in the NSW Supreme Court and, as you can see, dozens and dozens of names on it,
in fact there is about 114 names on this particular document. Some of them
deserve to be there.
There is dozens who should never have been on this document
and you come down to people. Look at Ken Mackay is now an assistant
commissioner, no reason why he should be on this document.
You come over the page, dozens of names and you look down
here, Nick Caldas is now the deputy NSW commissioner. No reason why he should
be on the document.
Respected detectives, Wayne Hayes, no reason why he should
be there. Neil Mercer and his police sources have analysed the names. The
warrant names about 114 serving and former police and a couple of civilians.
Basically, six police out of that 114 went to jail, fair enough, there is no
question, some of those names, some of the people on the warrant were corrupt.
I think about another eight police left the police force. Really, the vast
majority, it appears there is no legitimate reason why they were on that
warrant.
Even an internal NSW police investigation into it said in
their view that at least 54 of those 114 names should not have been on that
warrant. There was no legitimate reason why they should ever been there, no
proof and what I have been told is that some of them were there for people as
get squares, personal vein debt Yass and some of the names on that warrant were
there on third, fourth, fifth hand hearsay. Covert operations using listening
devices under the code name Mascot, gathered probative evidence of corruption
but some innocent police became suspicious when they were visited by M5 on
various pretexts.
This was the era after the 1990s Wood Royal Commission
established endemic corruption existed within the force. That commission was successful,
largely because of covert surveillance.
In 2002, police corruption involving the drug trade on
Sydney's northern beaches was sensationally exposed, again through successful
covert surveillance in a joint agency operation called Florida.
But in 2004,
following complaints from the police association and some of the aggrieved
officers with unblemished service records named in the affidavit, then police
commissioner Ken Moroney established Strike Force Emblems to
inquire into the alleged criminal misuse of the warrants.
Deputy Commissioner Cath Burn |
Emblems, overseen by senior police investigators reported
with recommendations for further investigation on 25 August 2005.This is what
all the fuss is about. This is the emblems report. Investigators say they were
unable to complete their inquiries into the contentious affidavit because of
the secrecy provisions of the NSW Crime Commission which prevented interviews
and evidence from all officers oversighting and conducting the surveillance
operation. conducting the M5 covert surveillance operation. Key finding said... established Strike Force Emblems recommended the
removal of the Crime Commission's secrecy provisions to the extent necessary so
a thorough investigation could be completed.
Seven years later no action has been taken on the emblems
recommendation. Now, the leaking of the
affidavit and other material to the
print media has reignited the hurt. At stake seems to be the standing of
current Deputy Commissioner Nick Caldas, in line for the top job when the
current commissioner retires soon. Also affected as another potential
commissioner, current Deputy Commissioner Cath Burn. She was once a part of the special crime unit which oversaw the covert operations with other agencies.
It has been reported investigation into the leaking of
material to Neil Mercer and other’s.
Tell us, who leaked it to you?
You know I won't tell you that and never would.
Premier Barry O'Farrell |
In May this year, Premier Barry O'Farrell, as minister now
responsible for the Police Integrity Commission wrote to David Levine inspector
of the PIC.
David Levine declined our request for an on camera interview.
David Levine declined our request for an on camera interview.
We would like to post our copy of the emblems report and
other documents on our web site to let some sun shine onto this dispute but on
legal advice, we can't, but on legal advice, we can't. Greens MLC David
Shoebridge said he can't, Shoebridge said he would consider tabling
appropriately redacted documents under parliamentary privilege if the
Government didn't act soon.
This ongoing controversy is putting in question the faith of
senior police and the faith of the public. We need to have someone cut through.
At the moment we have the Police Integrity Commission, the Crime Commission,
internal affairs, all potentially involved in the matters under inquiry.
None of them can conduct an independent inquiry. We need an
independent judicial inquiry to cut through. The usually camera-friendly
minister for police Mike Gallagher declined to be interviewed.
Opposition police spokesman and former Premier Nathan Reece
says Emblems was problematic for the former Government because its release could
identify informants who fingered the corrupt. If such sensitive information
could be excluded -I think it is important for the public that this be released,
this document.
More complaints are coming I am told. Such is the anger in
the NSW police force that this dead cat, as it is being called by senior police,
will continue to stink up the policing of this State until the air is cleared.
No comments:
Post a Comment